Program Committee
Committee Chairs
The Program Committee was chaired by Paul Townend (University of Leeds, UK), with co-chairs and members drawn from leading universities and research institutions worldwide.
Committee Members
Reviewers represented institutions across Japan, Germany, Korea, Brazil, the United States, Denmark, Austria, Italy, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
| Name | Affiliation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Shuichi Oikawa | University of Tsukuba | Japan |
| Mathias Pacher | University of Frankfurt | Germany |
| Moonju Park | Incheon National University | Korea |
| Carlos Pereira | UFRGS | Brazil |
| Robert Pettit | The Aerospace Corporation | United States |
| Paul Townend | University of Leeds | United Kingdom |
Additional reviewers and members listed in the full program committee record also included representatives from DTU Compute (Denmark), Vienna University of Technology (Austria), Malina Software Corp., and other universities and industry laboratories across Australia, Italy, Korea, and Germany.
For full details and a complete roster, refer to the conference proceedings or contact the Organizing Committee.
Real-time computing sits at the heart of systems where predictability, responsiveness, and correctness must coexist. As embedded devices grow more interconnected and software stacks more layered, the discipline continues to draw researchers and practitioners who care about deadlines as much as outcomes. Workshops, tutorials, and panel discussions tied to the symposium typically explore how scheduling, middleware, and operating system design evolve to meet those demands.
Service-oriented system engineering extends that conversation by treating distributed capabilities as composable building blocks. Instead of monolithic applications, teams design architectures where independently deployed services collaborate across networks, clouds, and edge devices. The emphasis is on loose coupling, well-defined interfaces, and the operational discipline required to keep such systems dependable at scale.
A recurring theme in this community is the tension between openness and rigor. Open standards, shared benchmarks, and reproducible experiments help diverse groups compare results fairly, while formal methods and rigorous evaluation guard against premature claims. Sessions often highlight case studies where careful measurement replaced intuition, showing how repeatable experiments can quietly reshape engineering practice.
Cross-disciplinary collaboration remains essential. Operating systems researchers, language designers, control engineers, and application domain experts bring vocabulary and constraints that rarely align neatly. The symposium's program is built to make those conversations easier, inviting work that translates ideas between communities and asks how techniques developed in one setting might apply in another.
Continuity also matters. Topics introduced at earlier meetings often resurface in refined form, alongside fresh challenges brought by new hardware, new deployment models, and new application domains. That ongoing dialogue, captured across proceedings and special issues, helps the field accumulate shared understanding while leaving room for the disruptive ideas that occasionally reset its direction.